This past weekend saw to the death of Serbia's infamous authoritarian "president" Slobodan Milosevic - whose death was shrouded in mystery. The pieces of the puzzle include accusations that he was being poisoned, an autopsy report that he died of a heart attack, and reports that his system had remnants of "non-prescribed" drugs. This is just what Milosevic-loyal Serbs need to continue the "victim" claims and perpetuate a mythologcially benevolent dictator.
The day after Milosevic's death came the 3rd anniversary of the assassination of Zoran Djindjic, the man who most would consider singularly responsible for Milosevic's overthrow and eventual extradition to the Hague.
Zoran DjindjicThe more I think about it, the more I can't help but feel like if Milosevic were to intentionally go, it would so predictably be under such auspices ... conspiratorial rumorings, intentionally misleading medications, and all done a day before Zoran Djindjic's death - almost so as to steal away any thunder of his commemoration.
Thus, this last weekend, the Serbs had a choice of who they would mourn. Either Milosevic, a dictator who fed their freshly post-communist need for strong leadership, and their lifelong addiction to nationalist rhetoric that glorifies defeat - or Djindjic, a man who didn't stoop to sugar coating the dismal reality of Serbia's chances for a prosperous future (a reality he and the other Serb people were handed by Milosevic)
The irony is thick, and whether the story has a happy or sad ending will eventually be decided by the Serb people in their decision of who to mourn for.